Theories

Mechanisms of change in self-management interventions: reactivity to self-monitoring and perceived autonomy

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 3 studies (3 quant-synthesis), q3–q4 · 1 of 3 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The review proposes two behavioral principles underlying SM. First, the reactivity principle: "behavior change can occur by the very function of engaging in the self‐monitoring aspect of a SM intervention" — collecting data on one's own behavior is thought to alter the behavior itself via internal reward mechanisms that influence motivation. Second, perceived autonomy: because SM lets students "self‐assess, self‐monitor behaviors, and self‐evaluate specific behaviors", it supports student autonomy, improving perceived ownership and motivation. The review adds that the iterative process provides practice opportunities that build self-efficacy and competency, and that autonomy support facilitates healthy student–teacher relationships that diminish challenging behaviors.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Mechanisms of change in self-management interventions: reactivity to self-monitoring and perceived autonomy
description The review proposes two behavioral principles underlying SM.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — smith-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.