Statistical significance as the criterion distinguishing a program effect from chance¶
Theory · All theories
Evidence · 6 claims (6 for) · 5 studies (4 causal, 1 review),q2–q3· 1 of 5 report an effect size · 6 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The brief's organizing account is that an observed difference between program and comparison groups counts as a program effect only when it is "not likely due to chance alone (that is, it is statistically significant)." This framework underlies the brief's guidance: a study finding no effect is one where the group difference did not meet this significance criterion, and interpreting such a result requires asking what could have caused it.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Outcome data for both a program group and a group that did not receive the program, so a difference can be tested
Constraints¶
- Framed for education program evaluations read by school and district decision-makers; the excerpt does not elaborate thresholds or test procedures
Target Learners¶
- school and district decision-makers
Target Learning Objectives¶
- interpreting evaluation findings, including studies that find no effects
Claims¶
- Author-reported statistically significant program effects did not remain significant after WWC corrections for clustering and multiple comparisons [+W]
- Head Start shows no discernible effects on mathematics achievement for 4-year-old children [+W]
- BCIRC has potentially positive effects on English language development (effect size 0.29, not statistically significant) [+W]
- Polya and Dahmus methods do not differ on the problem solution criterion [+W]
- In a quasi-experimental study, CIRC showed no statistically significant effect on comprehension outcomes after WWC clustering and multiple-comparison adjustments [+W]
- A larger percentage of BCIRC students met the bilingual education exit criterion in language (39% versus 21%), not statistically significant [+W]
Related Theories¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Neil Seftor. (2016). What Does It Mean When a Study Finds No Effects?. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
theory |
title |
Statistical significance as the criterion distinguishing a program effect from chance |
description |
The brief's organizing account is that an observed difference between program and comparison groups counts as a program effect only when it is "not likely due to chance alone (that is, it is statistically significant)... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — neil-seftor-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.