Theories

Taxonomy of seven TCSA models by interim blueprint design and score aggregation method

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 4 claims (3 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 review), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

The review organizes through-course summative assessment models along two axes: interim blueprint design (distributed vs. cumulative) and summative score aggregation method (simple vs. complex). It states that "Table 2.1 presents a matrix of seven models found in the literature based on combinations of blueprint designs and aggregation methods." Distributed blueprints divide "the summative blueprint...into mutually exclusive parts where each part is assigned to an interim time period," while cumulative blueprints measure all content taught to date. Complex aggregation uses latent trait or IRT/MIRT models.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Taxonomy of seven TCSA models by interim blueprint design and score aggregation method
description The review organizes through-course summative assessment models along two axes: interim blueprint design (distributed vs.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — garron-gianopulos-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.