Theories

Traditional versus constructivist conceptions of teaching/learning framework

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q3 · 1 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The article organizes prospective teachers' conceptions about teaching/learning under two philosophically grounded categories: traditional and constructivist conceptions. Traditional teaching is described as teacher-centered knowledge transmission in which students are passive recipients, whereas the constructivist approach is student-centered, involving "facilitating understanding, collaboration in learning process, and knowledge construction based on students' previous learning experiences". The study measures both conceptions with the TLCQ (Chan & Elliott, 2004) in value and practice forms, and pairs them with three assessment-conception dimensions (making learning explicit, promoting learning autonomy, performance orientation) drawn from James and Pedder's (2006) framework.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Traditional versus constructivist conceptions of teaching/learning framework
description The article organizes prospective teachers' conceptions about teaching/learning under two philosophically grounded categories: traditional and constructivist conceptions.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — eren-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.