Claims

The 3-2-1 strategy shows no statistically significant effect on EFL students' ability to summarize the text

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 ANCOVA found no statistically significant effect of the strategy on summary questions, F(1, 82) = 0.03, p = .870, partial eta squared = .00. → Alsamadani 2011

Evidence

Alsamadani 2011

Hashem Ahmed Alsamadani. (2011). The Effects of the 3-2-1 Reading Strategy on EFL Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p184

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Item-level ANCOVA on the 85-student quasi-experiment at alpha = .01, with η² = .00 (partial eta squared = .00), a negligible printed effect size. The author explains that summarizing "is dependent on more than just understanding the text", including the ability to express understanding in writing and to recall what was read.

"The results indicate that there was no statistically significant effect of the strategy used on the students' ability to summarize the text, F (1, 82) = 0.03, p = .870, partial eta squared = .00."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.