Claims

Patient-specific 3D-printed cloaca model rated high-quality and feasible for preoperative cysto-vaginoscopy training, with 85.4% recommending its use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the Krois et al. evaluation, 41 participants rated the patient-specific 3D-printed cloaca model as high-quality and feasible for preoperative training, with 85.4% recommending its use. → Zahradníková Petra 2025

Evidence

Zahradníková Petra 2025

Zahradníková Petra, Babala Jozef, Lindák Martin, Pechanová Rebeka, Hnilicová Silvia, Molnár Marián, Nedomová Barbora, Poš Lucie, Dotlačil Vojtěch, Kučerová Barbora. (2025). Systematic review of the training process of minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants. Pediatric Surgery International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06095-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Evaluation of a real-size 3D-printed cloaca model for cysto-vaginoscopy training. The review reports that "Forty-one participants rated the patient-specific 3D-printed cloaca model as high-quality and feasible for preoperative training, with 85.4% recommending its use".

"Krois et al. [80] aimed to evaluate the quality and feasibility of a real-size 3D-printed cloaca model for the purpose of cysto-vaginoscopy evaluation. Forty-one participants rated the patient-specific 3D-printed cloaca model as high-quality and feasible for preoperative training, with 85.4% recommending its use"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.