The 5E instructional model shows a large, significant pooled effect on academic achievement versus traditional teaching methods in Turkish studies (2008-2014)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Meta-analysis of 13 studies found a random effects effect size of ES=1.132 for academic achievement in favour of the 5E model over traditional methods. → Özgür Anil 2015 q3 i? Under the fixed effects model the mean achievement effect size was 0.956 with a significant Z-test result. → Özgür Anil 2015 (2)

Evidence¶

Özgür Anil 2015¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis (analysis of analyses) of 13 Turkish pretest-posttest control-group studies on the 5E model, pooled under the random effects model. The article reports "the effect size value was ES=1.132" with a 95% CI of 0.665 to 1.599, classified as large by Cohen (1992).

"Based on this distribution, when the 13 studies on the 5E instructional model were compared according to the random effects model, it was found that standard error was 0.238 and the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 1.599, while the lower limit was 0.665, and the effect size value was ES=1.132."

Özgür Anil 2015 (2)¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Fixed effects model analysis of the same 13 achievement studies. The article reports a mean effect size of 0.956 (SE 0.084, 95% CI 0.791-1.121) and states the Z-test "yielded z=11.350, indicating that the analysis was of statistical significance".

"In the analysis of these studies according to the fixed effects model, standard error was calculated as 0.084; the upper limit of the confidence interval of 95% was found to be 1.121, the lower limit 0.791. Mean effect size was calculated as 0.956."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The constructivist learning approach has a strong positive overall effect on students' academic achievement compared to traditional teaching methods (ES = 1.156). — a broader claim this one bears on
• The 5E model shows a large pooled effect on retention scores versus traditional methods, though the article's own Z-test is reported as non-significant — related
• Computer-based teaching has a large, positive, significant effect on students' academic success compared with traditional teaching methods in Turkish studies from 2006-2014 — related
• Control groups taught with traditional methods in Turkish geometry and numbers theses show a large average pretest-posttest gain of about 0.83 standard deviations — related
• Vocabulary development interventions have a large average positive effect on cognitive vocabulary outcomes (g = 1.179) compared with traditional teaching methods — related
• MIT-based instruction shows a large overall positive effect on students' academic achievement in a meta-analysis of 75 Turkish experimental theses and dissertations — related