Claims

Successful implementation of both interventions was supported by a training programme emphasising fidelity and consistency with ongoing project-team support

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The process evaluation attributed successful implementation to well-designed training emphasising fidelity and consistency, enforced by ongoing support from the project team. → McNally et al. 2016

Evidence

McNally et al. 2016

Sandra McNally, Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela and Heather Rolfe. (2016). ABRA: Online Reading Support — Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18254678

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative process evaluation (interviews with 16 TAs, observation of 13 ICT and five non-ICT sessions in six schools, plus project-team data) analysed by thematic analysis within a framework approach. The report also found no issues of concern over implementation or fidelity.

"Successful implementation contributed to a well-designed and delivered training programme which emphasised fidelity and consistency, enforced by ongoing support from the project team."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.