Successful implementation of both interventions was supported by a training programme emphasising fidelity and consistency with ongoing project-team support¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The process evaluation attributed successful implementation to well-designed training emphasising fidelity and consistency, enforced by ongoing support from the project team. → McNally et al. 2016
Evidence¶
McNally et al. 2016¶
Sandra McNally, Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela and Heather Rolfe. (2016). ABRA: Online Reading Support — Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18254678
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Qualitative process evaluation (interviews with 16 TAs, observation of 13 ICT and five non-ICT sessions in six schools, plus project-team data) analysed by thematic analysis within a framework approach. The report also found no issues of concern over implementation or fidelity.
"Successful implementation contributed to a well-designed and delivered training programme which emphasised fidelity and consistency, enforced by ongoing support from the project team."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Ongoing technical and pedagogical support plus ample mathematics resources were the two elements teachers identified as key to successful implementation — related
- PBL was generally delivered with fidelity but required substantial management support and organisational change — related
- Nearly a quarter of schools failed to deliver the intervention, and successful implementation required senior-leader support, dedicated space, staff time and a timetabled slot — related
- Four implementation themes emerged from UK process evaluations: intervention format, policy consistency, staff buy-in, and perceived effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.