Claims

PBL was generally delivered with fidelity but required substantial management support and organisational change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Delivery fidelity was generally achieved, but the intervention demanded substantial management support and organisational change, and the Innovation Unit training and support programme was found effective in supporting it. → Menzies 2016

Evidence

Menzies 2016

Menzies, V., Hewitt, C., Kokotsaki, D., Collyer, C. and Wiggins, A. (2016). Project Based Learning: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/EEF_Project_Protocol_ProjectBasedLearning.pdf

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Conclusion from the process evaluation of the 12 intervention schools, based on visits, lesson observations, interviews and focus groups at two time points plus two case-study schools. Not all schools maintained mixed-ability classes or secured the recommended weekly planning time.

"PBL was generally delivered with fidelity but requires substantial management support and organisational change. The Innovation Unit training and support programme for teachers and school leadership was found to be effective in supporting this intervention."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.