Claims

Ongoing technical and pedagogical support plus ample mathematics resources were the two elements teachers identified as key to successful implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The process evaluation identified ongoing support for teachers and ample mathematics resources as the two key elements indicating likelihood of successful implementation. → Rudd 2017

Evidence

Rudd 2017

Rudd, P., Villaneuva Aguilera, A. B., Elliott, L., & Chambers, B. (2017). MathsFlip: Flipped Learning — Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=&filters=intervention%3AMathsFlip%2CfunderName%3AEducation+Endowment+Foundation&searchType=advanced-search

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Process evaluation drawing on five instruments (staff interviews, online surveys, telephone interviews, school visits with lesson observation, and teacher/pupil focus groups), analysed by triangulation. Teachers valued prompt technical fixes and the project manager's coaching; pupils enjoyed the online resources and their immediate feedback.

"Two key elements were identified which indicated the likelihood of successful implementation: ongoing support for teachers and ample mathematics resources."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.