No statistically significant post-test difference was found between the Jigsaw IV and Jigsaw II groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The independent-samples t-test on post-test scores found no statistically significant difference between the experiment (Jigsaw IV, mean 7.12) and control (Jigsaw II, mean 7.95) groups. → Turkmen 2015

Evidence¶

Turkmen 2015¶

Turkmen, H. & Buyukaltay, D. (2015). Which one is better? Jigsaw II versus Jigsaw IV on the subject of the building blocks of matter and atom. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 1(2), 88-94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105340

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-group t-test comparing post-test scores of the 24-student Jigsaw IV group (mean 7.12, SD 2.36) and 24-student Jigsaw II group (mean 7.95, SD 1.92); t = -1.340, p = 0.187. The article concludes "The Jigsaw IV technique and Jigsaw II technique ... have shown equally success".

"A statistically significant difference at level of 0.05 was not obtained in the independent group t -test performed for the achievement post -tests of the control and experiment groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Jigsaw II instruction produced a statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gain in the control group — related
• Jigsaw IV instruction produced a statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gain in the experiment group — related
• No significant difference in achievement between ABSI and control groups on pre-test or post-test scores — related