Claims

Classroom-based physical activity improves academic achievement when progress monitoring tools are the outcome measure (pooled SMD = 1.03)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 When progress monitoring tools were used (4 studies), academic-related outcomes generally showed improvement (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.84). → Watson Amanda 2017

Evidence

Watson Amanda 2017

Watson Amanda, Timperio Anna, Brown Helen, Best Keren, Hesketh Kylie D. (2017). Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 4 studies using progress monitoring tools as the academic achievement measure. The review reports outcomes "generally showed improvement" with SMD = 1.03 (95% CI: -0.22,1.84); the interval includes zero.

"When progress monitoring tools were used (4 studies) as the outcome measure, academic-related outcomes generally showed improvement (standardised mean difference = 1.03 (95% CI: -0.22,1.84))"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.