Claims

In-classroom physical activity breaks significantly improve primary school children's spelling performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 IcPAB had a statistically significant, large pooled effect on spelling performance (SMD = 2.13, p = 0.03). → Peiris D. L. I. H. K. 2022

Evidence

Peiris D. L. I. H. K. 2022

Peiris D. L. I. H. K., Duan Yanping, Vandelanotte Corneel, Liang Wei, Yang Min, Baker Julien Steven. (2022). Effects of In-Classroom Physical Activity Breaks on Children’s Academic Performance, Cognition, Health Behaviours and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159479

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of a single study (Egger et al., two intervention arms, n = 188 students) evaluating spelling. The pooled SMD = 2.13 was statistically significant (p = 0.03) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 11%); the review hedges that breaks "might have an impact".

"The result with a statistically significant, large, pooled effect estimate (SMD = 2.13, 95% CI [0.21 to 4.05], p = 0.03; I2 = 11%, p = 0.45) confirmed that the classroom-based physical activity breaks might have an impact on primary school kids’ spelling performance"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.