Repeated listening improves oral reading fluency in second-grade students, with Listening Only outgaining Reading While Listening and Reading Only¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a seven-week study of 75 second-grade students randomly assigned to Reading While Listening, Listening Only, and Reading Only conditions, the Listening Only group achieved the largest oral reading fluency gain (24 words per minute), ahead of Reading Only (19) and Reading While Listening (18). → Salarvand 2022
q2 i? In the same study, Reading Only produced the largest reading comprehension gain (6.5%), Listening Only gained 4%, and Reading While Listening showed an average loss of 1%. → Salarvand 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Salarvand 2022¶
Salarvand, L., Guimaraes, N., & Balagholi, Z. (2022). Instructional Strategies' Impacts on EFL Learners Reading Fluency: A Review. THAITESOL JOURNAL, 35(1), 77-90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1340892
q2 · i? · review · r1
Experimental study by Jablonski (2019) with 75 second-grade students randomly assigned to RWL, LO and RO conditions over seven weeks, one story per week, tested with BIBELS pretest and posttest. The review reports the LO group's "average improvement of 24 words per minute" versus 19 for RO and 18 for RWL.
"The LO group got higher scores in oral reading fluency with an average improvement of 24 words per minute. The second higher scores were gained by RO with an average improvement of 19 words per minute."
Salarvand 2022 (2)¶
Salarvand, L., Guimaraes, N., & Balagholi, Z. (2022). Instructional Strategies' Impacts on EFL Learners Reading Fluency: A Review. THAITESOL JOURNAL, 35(1), 77-90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1340892
q2 · i? · review · r2
Same Jablonski (2019) experiment, EasyCBM comprehension posttest. The review reports RO's "average gain of 6.5%", LO's 4% gain, and an average 1% comprehension loss for RWL, attributing RO's advantage to reading at one's own speed and rereading.
"In terms of reading comprehension, RO had the highest scores with an average gain of 6.5%, which showed a higher number of correct answers on EasyCBM assessment."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Reading Fluency — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
-
Fluency-building activities for struggling readers in grades 4–9 have strong evidence, based on 33 studies — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Reading and listening yield similar proportions of incidental vocabulary learning, with reading ahead only on some immediate posttests — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Gains from an intensive period of second-language study persist for weeks without rehearsal. — related
- Presentation condition does not differentially affect microstructure comprehension over five weeks, though VNT and NT groups improved while the text-only group did not — related
- Extensive reading accompanied by peer interaction produced greater reading achievement gains than ER without peer interaction, no ER, or ER with teacher conferences — related
- Students using Renzulli Learning for 16 weeks show significantly higher oral reading fluency growth than business-as-usual peers (effect size +0.10) — related
- During COVID, a third-grade volume-of-reading strategy showed greater reading growth than a control group without the strategy — related
- Two years of multicomponent fluency intervention produced greater word-reading and fluency growth than one year or control, with no comprehension differences — related
- Noninstruction, transition, and listening to oral reading consumed almost 31 percent of fourth-grade teachers' reading-period time — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
repeated-listening-improves-oral-reading-fluency |
title |
Repeated listening improves oral reading fluency in second-grade students, with Listening Only outgaining Reading While Listening and Reading Only |
description |
Repeated listening improves oral reading fluency in second-grade students, with Listening Only outgaining Reading While Listening and Reading Only |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — salarvand-2022, salarvand-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.