Immersion principle: people do not necessarily learn better in 3D immersive virtual reality than with a corresponding 2D desktop presentation (d = -0.10 across 9 tests)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-22 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i0 Across 9 experimental tests, adding 3D immersive virtual reality did not improve learning over corresponding 2D desktop presentations, with a mean effect size of -0.10. → Richard E. Mayer 2024

Evidence¶

Richard E. Mayer 2024¶

Richard E. Mayer. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

q3 · i0 · theoretical · r3

Table 6 summary of the author's lab's experimental tests reports the immersion principle with an effect size of "-0.10" across "9" tests, finding no benefit for 3D immersive virtual reality over a corresponding 2D desktop presentation.

"14. Immersion principle: People do not necessarily learn better in 3D immersive virtual reality than with a corresponding 2D desktop presentation -0.10 9"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a piloted virtual reality WIL, most students reported improved crisis-problem-solving understanding and high enjoyment — related
• VR improved movement-based transfer test performance versus reading in security training, while learning in VR without the possibility to act was detrimental — related
• Immersive VR simulation increased self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation more than a conventional safety manual in laboratory safety training — related
• No difference in extraneous cognitive load between modality conditions in VR, contrary to the modality principle — related
• Immersive technologies such as virtual reality should reinforce, not substitute, the original educational action — related
• No difference in intrinsic cognitive load between visual-only and audio-visual text conditions in VR — related
• Immersion in virtual reality adds extraneous load yet can boost transfer, enjoyment, and motivation while leaving retention unaffected — related
• In an immersive VR learning environment, visual-only text yields higher recall than audio-visual text (reverse modality effect) — related
• In Desktop-VR, interaction format (object movement vs. camera movement vs. no interaction) showed no significant main effect on learning outcomes — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Immersive lessons show a small effect size advantage over less immersive technology, but increased presence does not necessarily lead to more learning — reports the opposite
• Learners' spatial ability moderates whether realistic visualizations help or hinder learning — related
• Students who experienced the virtual field trip via a 3D HMD scored higher on a delayed posttest roughly three weeks later than 2D-video students — reports the opposite
• Middle-school students taking a virtual field trip via a 3D HMD report higher interest than students taking the same trip as a 2D video — reports the opposite
• Middle-school students taking a virtual field trip via a 3D HMD report higher presence than students taking the same trip as a 2D video — related