Claims

Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Perceived risk is significantly and negatively associated with frequency of ChatGPT use (β = −0.20, p <.001). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 q3 i? Perceived risk is significantly and negatively associated with intention to use ChatGPT (β = −0.46, p <.001). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)

Evidence

Ortiz-Bonnin 2025

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Cross-sectional online survey of 468 ChatGPT users at a Spanish university; hypothesis-testing regression within a mediation model. The article reports perceived risk was "significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001)".

"First, perceived risk was significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001) and intention to use ( β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1a and H1b."

Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same survey and mediation model; the article reports perceived risk negatively associated with intention to use (β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1b. No standardized effect size beyond the regression coefficient is printed.

"First, perceived risk was significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001) and intention to use ( β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1a and H1b."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id perceived-risk-negative-chatgpt-use-frequency-intention
title Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates
description Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ortiz-bonnin-2025, ortiz-bonnin-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.