Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Perceived risk is significantly and negatively associated with frequency of ChatGPT use (β = −0.20, p <.001). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025
q3 i? Perceived risk is significantly and negatively associated with intention to use ChatGPT (β = −0.46, p <.001). → Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Ortiz-Bonnin 2025¶
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Cross-sectional online survey of 468 ChatGPT users at a Spanish university; hypothesis-testing regression within a mediation model. The article reports perceived risk was "significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001)".
"First, perceived risk was significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001) and intention to use ( β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1a and H1b."
Ortiz-Bonnin 2025 (2)¶
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same survey and mediation model; the article reports perceived risk negatively associated with intention to use (β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1b. No standardized effect size beyond the regression coefficient is printed.
"First, perceived risk was significantly and negatively associated with use frequency (β = − 0.20, p <.001) and intention to use ( β = − 0.46, p <.001), supporting H1a and H1b."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Perceived academic dishonesty is not directly related to ChatGPT use frequency or intention to use — related
- Students with higher perceived academic dishonesty perceive greater risk in using ChatGPT — related
- Perceived risk mediates the relationship between perceived academic dishonesty and ChatGPT usage (indirect-only mediation) — related
- ChatGPT use frequency and intention to use are strongly positively correlated — related
- Positive and negative AI perceptions are strongly negatively co-related within individuals (τ = −0.819), refuting an ambivalent-attitude reading of aggregate frequencies — related
- AI-related fear shows a differentiated pattern: positive direct association with AI use but negative association with pedagogical AI competence and negative indirect effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
perceived-risk-negative-chatgpt-use-frequency-intention |
title |
Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates |
description |
Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ortiz-bonnin-2025, ortiz-bonnin-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.