Claims

AI knowledge and attitudes toward AI did not significantly predict teachers' AI integration ability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? AI Knowledge (p = 0.466) and Attitude Toward AI in ESD (p = 0.343) showed no statistically significant effect on AI Integration Ability. → Riandi Riandi 2026

Evidence

Riandi Riandi 2026

Riandi Riandi, Ismail Ismail, Ida Kaniawati, Wahyu Sopandi, Diana Ayu Rostikawati, Defrizal Hamka & Suhendar Suhendar. (2026). Teacher involvement in developing sustainable education materials for AI integration in green energy education. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34422-4

q3 · i? · associational · r1

In the same PLS-SEM survey of 122 teachers, both paths were non-significant; the article prints p-values but no effect sizes for these null findings, so no magnitude is reported. Equivalence was not tested.

"In contrast, AI Knowledge and Attitude Toward AI in ESD did not significantly affect AI Integration Ability (p = 0.466 and p = 0.343, respectively)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ai-knowledge-attitudes-not-significant-predictors
title AI knowledge and attitudes toward AI did not significantly predict teachers' AI integration ability
description AI knowledge and attitudes toward AI did not significantly predict teachers' AI integration ability
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — riandi-riandi-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.