In the fitted model, teachers' knowledge and willingness to change predicted teaching practice, whereas professional beliefs did not significantly influence teaching practice¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr?·q3·i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Changes in teaching practices were influenced by teachers' knowledge (β = 0.30) and willingness to change (β = 0.26) with small to moderate effect sizes. → Donath 2025
q3 i0 Teachers' professional beliefs did not significantly influence their teaching practice (β = 0.08). → Donath 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Donath 2025¶
Donath, J. L., Lüke, T., Tran, U. S., Botes, E., & Goetz, T. (2025). The Transfer of Teacher Training to Inclusive Classroom Practice: A Meta-Analytic SEM Approach. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10081-9
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?
Path estimates from the main MASEM analysis of the Willingness-to-Change model. The article reports that "Changes in teaching practices were influenced with small to moderate effect sizes by teachers’ knowledge" and willingness to change, with standardized coefficients and 95% CIs as printed.
"Changes in teaching practices were influenced with small to moderate effect sizes by teachers’ knowledge (β = 0.30, 95% [0.15, 0.44]) and willingness to change (β = 0.26, 95% [0.06,.046])"
Donath 2025 (2)¶
Donath, J. L., Lüke, T., Tran, U. S., Botes, E., & Goetz, T. (2025). The Transfer of Teacher Training to Inclusive Classroom Practice: A Meta-Analytic SEM Approach. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10081-9
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r?
Path estimate from the main MASEM analysis of the Willingness-to-Change model: the article reports that "Teachers’ professional beliefs did not significantly influence their teaching practice (β = 0.08, 95% [−0.09, 0.25])."
"Teachers’ professional beliefs did not significantly influence their teaching practice (β = 0.08, 95% [−0.09, 0.25])."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Knowledge-to-Practice, Reaction-to-Training, and Practice-to-Belief models were not well-suited to explain empirical transfer data, and Knowledge-Skills-Beliefs fit only in RCT/quasi-experimental subsets — related
- Teacher training for inclusive education had a large effect on teachers' knowledge and moderate effects on willingness to change, skills, and beliefs in the fitted Willingness-to-Change model — related
- AI knowledge and attitudes toward AI did not significantly predict teachers' AI integration ability — related
- Review reports that teachers' beliefs, attitudes and TPACK—not AI knowledge alone—mediate AI integration — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
willingness-predicts-practice-beliefs-do-not |
title |
In the fitted model, teachers' knowledge and willingness to change predicted teaching practice, whereas professional beliefs did not significantly influence teaching practice |
description |
In the fitted model, teachers' knowledge and willingness to change predicted teaching practice, whereas professional beliefs did not significantly influence teaching practice |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — donath-2025, donath-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.