Claims

All racial and ethnic subgroups in the treated class shifted toward uncertainty about racial classifications after the lessons

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the treated class, White students moved from about 3 to about 20 nationalities marked 'not sure,' Black students from about 6 to about 22, Hispanics from about 5 to about 20, Asians from about 4 to about 19, and multiracial students from about 18 to all 27. → Cherry et al. 2014

Evidence

Cherry et al. 2014

Stephen M. Cherry, Amy Lucas, Kim A. Case, and William T. Hoston. (2014). Who is White? Assessing Students' Perceptions of Whiteness through Active-Learning Effectiveness and the Construction of Racial Doubt. The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 14, No.3, 2014, 68-83. http://www.understandingrace.org/home.html

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive subgroup analysis from Table 1 (N = 63 treated students). Due to small cell sizes, the authors conducted no tests of statistical significance for the racial/ethnic subgroups, so these are untested descriptive shifts.

"At Time 2, all racial and ethnic groups demonstrated a much greater likelihood of being unsure. Whites and Hispanics identified, on aver age, approximately 20 nationalities as "not sure," while Blacks identified approximately 22 and Asians approximately 19."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.