Claims

Students who received active-learning lessons designed to raise racial doubt became far less certain in classifying nationalities as White or non-White than students in a lecture-only course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At Time 2, treated-course students averaged approximately two of 27 nationalities as White, four as non-White, and 21 as 'not sure,' versus approximately seven, 12, and eight in the non-treated course, a statistically significant difference. → Cherry et al. 2014

Evidence

Cherry et al. 2014

Stephen M. Cherry, Amy Lucas, Kim A. Case, and William T. Hoston. (2014). Who is White? Assessing Students' Perceptions of Whiteness through Active-Learning Effectiveness and the Construction of Racial Doubt. The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 14, No.3, 2014, 68-83. http://www.understandingrace.org/home.html

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment in two undergraduate race and ethnicity courses (N = 97) taught in consecutive spring semesters; only one course received the doubt-raising materials. Post-lesson survey showed treated students "overwhelmingly likely to be 'unsure' about racial classifications"; Figure 2 notes significance at the 0.01 level.

"Student in the treated class identified, on average, approximately two of the 27 nationalities as White, four as non -White, and 21 as "n ot sure." Conversely, students in the non-treated class were far more certain in their identifications."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.