Claims

Treated students attributed their new uncertainty to personal and emotive engagement with classmates' self-identified racial narratives

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students said they 'had to think a lot harder' and 'were really confused,' and cited the personal narratives exercise, in which classmates' self-identifications contradicted how students would have classified them. → Cherry et al. 2014

Evidence

Cherry et al. 2014

Stephen M. Cherry, Amy Lucas, Kim A. Case, and William T. Hoston. (2014). Who is White? Assessing Students' Perceptions of Whiteness through Active-Learning Effectiveness and the Construction of Racial Doubt. The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 14, No.3, 2014, 68-83. http://www.understandingrace.org/home.html

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-lesson qualitative questioning of treated-class students about why they became unsure. The article contrasts this with the non-treated class, where some students expressed confusion about the biology of race but did not refer to personal or emotive points that changed their perceptions.

"Many students also referred to the assigned and shared pe r- sonal narratives exercise and stated that there were students who consi dered themselves White that they did not think looked White and vice versa"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.