ANCOVA controlling for pre-test confirms a significant effect of metacognitive strategy treatment on post-test comprehension¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? One-way ANCOVA with pre-test as covariate showed a significant effect of the experimental treatment, F = 219.411, p < 0.05, with R Squared = .824 for the corrected model. → Yahya Othman 2014

Evidence¶

Yahya Othman 2014¶

Yahya Othman, Zamri Mahamud & Noradinah Jaidi. (2014). The Effects of Metacognitive Strategy in Reading Expository Text. International Education Studies, 7(13). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p102

q3 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANCOVA on the experimental group's pre- and post-test scores, controlling the pre-test covariate; Table 4 also prints R Squared = .824 (Adjusted R Squared = .817) and a significant pre-test covariate effect (F = 26.010).

"Through the One Way Ancova analysis in Table 4, there is a significant difference between mean for pre-test and post-test for experimental group p= 0.00 < 0.05 (F-ratio = 493.22/2.25 = 219.41 p < 0.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• ANCOVA controlling for pre-test scores confirmed that metacognitive strategy with books of literary quality improved reading comprehension relative to the control group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Fifth-grade students using metacognitive strategy with books of literary quality scored significantly higher in post-test reading comprehension than a control group reading the 100 Basic Works conventionally — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)