Claims

ANCOVA controlling for pre-test scores confirmed that metacognitive strategy with books of literary quality improved reading comprehension relative to the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A one-way ANCOVA on post-test scores controlling for pre-test reading scores showed a significant effect of group membership (F(1,63) = 169.85, p < .001). → Erkan Çer 2016

Evidence

Erkan Çer 2016

Erkan Çer, Ertuğrul Şahin. (2016). Improving Reading Comprehension Skills with Children's Books through Metacognitive Strategy: The Turkish Context. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1566

q3 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANCOVA in SPSS 23 comparing post-intervention scores of the experimental and control groups controlling for pre-test scores. The table prints F = 169.85 for the Experimental Group source with Sig. .000; no effect size is printed, so impact is null.

"The One Way Ancova analysis also revealed a significant difference between the pre -test and the post-test in the experimental group that is, using metacognitive strategy in books of literary quality improved the reading comprehension sk ills of the students in the experimental group when compared to the control group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.