Claims

Fifth-grade students using metacognitive strategy with books of literary quality scored significantly higher in post-test reading comprehension than a control group reading the 100 Basic Works conventionally

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The experimental group's post-test reading comprehension scores were significantly higher than the control group's, with a very large effect (Cohen's d = 3.10, p < .001). → Erkan Çer 2016

Evidence

Erkan Çer 2016

Erkan Çer, Ertuğrul Şahin. (2016). Improving Reading Comprehension Skills with Children's Books through Metacognitive Strategy: The Turkish Context. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1566

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Independent-sample t-tests on pre- and post-test reading comprehension scores in a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group study of 65 fifth-graders (35 experimental, 30 control). The post-test contrast favored the experimental group: "t(63): 13.89, Cohen's d: 3.10, p<.001".

"there was a significant difference between the experimental and the control group in post -test re ading comprehesion scores ( t(63): 13.89, Cohen's d: 3.10, p<.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.