Claims

When pretest scores were controlled, the posttest attitude difference between the visual-materials and traditional groups was not statistically significant, though the experimental group's adjusted mean was higher

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA of posttest GWAS scores adjusted for pretest showed no meaningful group difference, F(1-44)=3.48, p>.05, with experimental mean 3.83 versus control 3.70. → Aykut Emre Bozdogan 2011

Evidence

Aykut Emre Bozdogan 2011

Aykut Emre Bozdogan. (2011). The Effects of Instruction with Visual Materials on the Development of Preservice Elementary Teachers' Knowledge and Attitude Towards Global Warming. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ932241

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA on posttest GWAS scores of both groups (Table 7, R Squared = .572): the group effect was not significant after controlling for pretest; the experimental mean (3.83) was descriptively higher than the control mean (3.70).

"Analysis of covariance results showed that when pretest total scores were controlled, it was not meaningful with respect to posttest adjusted mean scores [F (1-44)=3.48, p>.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.