Claims

Instruction with visual materials rectified more global warming misconceptions than traditional instruction (about 40% versus about 12% success)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Preservice teachers taught with visual materials reduced misconceptions about the reasons for global warming from 14 to 6, while the control group reduced them only from 10 to 9. → Aykut Emre Bozdogan 2011

Evidence

Aykut Emre Bozdogan 2011

Aykut Emre Bozdogan. (2011). The Effects of Instruction with Visual Materials on the Development of Preservice Elementary Teachers' Knowledge and Attitude Towards Global Warming. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ932241

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Analysis of open-ended question answers (Table 2) in a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study of 47 preservice teachers: experimental group misconceptions fell from 14 to 6, deficient knowledge from 4 to 3; control group misconceptions fell only from 10 to 9. The article reports "approximately 40%" versus "approximately 12%" success.

"The number of preservice teachers who had misconceptions about the reasons for global warming decreased from 14 to 6. The number of those with deficient information decreased from 4 to 3."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.