Claims

Teachers perceived AI-supported futures as increasingly imaginable and linked to present actions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The predominant approaching markers were Ap1 (30%) — the future becoming more imaginable — and Ap2 (28%) — awareness that current actions influence future results. → Daniusevičiūtė-Brazaitė L 2026

Evidence

Daniusevičiūtė-Brazaitė L 2026

Daniusevičiūtė-Brazaitė L, Gaižiūnienė L and Pučėtaitė R (2026) AI in inclusive education: teachers' visions of future-oriented practices. Front. Educ. 11:1890925. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1890925

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of 50 teacher essays on approaching markers. The article states "The strong presence of Ap2 suggests that teachers are increasingly aware of how current actions influence future results".

"The predominant indicators regarding this perception were Ap1 (30%) and Ap2 (28%) – see Table 3."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id approaching-markers-future-attainability
title Teachers perceived AI-supported futures as increasingly imaginable and linked to present actions
description Teachers perceived AI-supported futures as increasingly imaginable and linked to present actions
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — daniusevičiūtė-brazaitė-l-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.