Claims

Imagining preferable futures, especially via backcasting, was seen by students as creating possibilities for agency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students expressed that imagination prompts action — values rather than short-term evaluation inspire agency (theme in 43% of interviews). → Tapio Rasa 2022

Evidence

Tapio Rasa 2022

Tapio Rasa, Elina Palmgren, Antti Laherto. (2022). Futurising science education: students' experiences from a course on futures thinking and quantum computing. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09572-3

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Interview excerpt (Lydia) exemplifying the theme 'Imagining preferable futures creates possibilities for agency' (43% of 21 interviews), tied to the backcasting method practised in the course.

"I'd just always thought that you go with 'small steps' going forward, but if you start from there in the perfect image, it's really good to start from there and like, how you get there."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id preferable-futures-backcasting-agency
title Imagining preferable futures, especially via backcasting, was seen by students as creating possibilities for agency
description Imagining preferable futures, especially via backcasting, was seen by students as creating possibilities for agency
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tapio-rasa-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.