AR-based instruction increases computer hardware course achievement compared to print materials in vocational education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Undergraduate students who learned motherboard assembly with the HardwareAR application scored significantly higher on the computer hardware achievement test than students who used print textbooks (U=164, p=.026). → Mustafa Sirakaya and Ebru Kilic Cakmak 2018
Evidence¶
Mustafa Sirakaya and Ebru Kilic Cakmak 2018¶
Mustafa Sirakaya and Ebru Kilic Cakmak. (2018). Effects of Augmented Reality on Student Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Vocational Education and Training. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET). https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.5.1.1
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental pre-test post-test study with matched pairs randomly assigned; 23 experimental and 23 control students. Posttest achievement means were 67.61 (AR) versus 57.39 (control); the Mann Whitney U-test showed "a significant difference in achievement" (U=164, p=.026).
"Table 3 points to a significant difference in achievement between the experimental group which took the courses with AR application and the control group which used the as-sembly manual (U=164, p <.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- AR instruction has no significant effect on motherboard assembly skills self-efficacy — related
- AR instruction has no significant effect on motherboard assembly theoretical-knowledge self-efficacy — related
- AR-supported learners complete motherboard assembly in shorter time and with less help than print-material learners — related
- Intelligent AR tutoring produces significantly higher post-test performance than non-intelligent AR training for motherboard assembly — related
- Mobile learning applications improve undergraduate academic achievement compared with traditional lecture-based instruction — related
- Detailed analogies produce significantly higher post-test success in learning computer hardware than traditional instruction — related
- AI-enabled personalized STEM education yields a statistically significant overall effect of g = 0.455, which its authors class as small, compared with traditional non-AI instruction in K-12 schools — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.