The tablet e-textbook experimental group significantly outperformed the traditionally taught control group on the post-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Ibtesam Al-Mashaqbeh and Muneera Al Shurman 2015: the intervention came bundled with another change; groups were assigned but students were analysed as independent (read from the study by two models, 2026-11-01)
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? At post-test, the experimental group taught with e-textbooks scored significantly higher than the control group taught with the traditional textbook method. → Ibtesam Al-Mashaqbeh and Muneera Al Shurman 2015
Evidence¶
Ibtesam Al-Mashaqbeh and Muneera Al Shurman 2015¶
Ibtesam Al-Mashaqbeh and Muneera Al Shurman. (2015). The Adoption of Tablet and e-Textbooks: first grade core curriculum and school administration attitude. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079146
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Between-group comparison at post-test (table 3): Regular group mean 90.93 (SD 4.228), Experimental group mean 94.50 (SD 1.954), t = -4.970, df 82, Sig. (2-tailed) .000, N=42 per group. The article reports the difference "significant in the side of the experiminal group"; no effect size is printed.
"revealed that it was significant in the side of the experiminal group as shown on table 3."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Geometric Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
- Statistical Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- First-grade students taught with tablet e-textbooks showed significant pre-test to post-test improvement in core curriculum achievement — related
- Students taught with the animation model significantly outperformed traditionally taught control students on the ATP generation post-test — related
- Primary students taught 'The Representation of the Earth' with AR scored higher on the post-test than students taught traditionally (M = 7.9 vs M = 6.4) — related
- Pre-service teachers taught probability with the ABSL approach achieved significantly higher post-test scores than those taught with traditional methods — related
- Undergraduate students taught organic chemistry with an analogy instructional strategy achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional lecture methods — related
- Foreign learners of Turkish taught grammar with personalized texts scored significantly higher on the post-test than learners taught with ordinary textbook examples — related
- Year 4 pupils taught two-dimensional shape properties with Logo outperformed a traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related
- Both ABSL and traditionally taught groups showed statistically significant pre-test to post-test achievement gains in probability — related
- Both ITS and traditionally instructed groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
- Fifth-grade students taught mathematics with fine art integration achieved significantly higher scores on all four mathematics tests than students taught traditionally — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.