Claims

Producers signal their own argumentative position with arrows pointing toward their own arguments and more boxes around own arguments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants who used boxes around arguments used more boxes for their own position than for the other position. → Marije van Amelsvoort 2016

Evidence

Marije van Amelsvoort 2016

Marije van Amelsvoort, Alfons Maes. (2016). Show me your opinion. Perceptual cues in creating and reading argument diagrams. Instructional Science 44:335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9378-9

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Production study: among participants who used boxes around arguments, all "used more boxes for their own position than for the other position" (p < .001 as printed). No effect size printed.

"If participants used boxes around arguments, all used more boxes for their own position than for the other position, p \ .001."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id arrows-and-boxes-signal-own-position
title Producers signal their own argumentative position with arrows pointing toward their own arguments and more boxes around own arguments
description Producers signal their own argumentative position with arrows pointing toward their own arguments and more boxes around own arguments
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — marije-van-amelsvoort-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.