Among two objects with the same signalling, participants focused more on the arrow-cued object, and the change occurred in the un-cued object¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Out of two objects with the same signalling, participants focused more on the object cued with an arrow; the change took place in the un-cued object and was detected when participants shifted to it. → Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018

Evidence¶

Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018¶

Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. & Bayram, S. (2018). Effects of cueing and signaling on change blindness in multimedia learning environment. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 128–139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205386

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Eye-tracking finding from the speaker scene, where two parts carried signalling but only one part received a visual cue; participants first focused on the cued object, then shifted to the un-cued object when the change occurred.

"In addition to this, it was seen that out of two objects with the same signalling, the participants focused more on the object that was cued with an arrow, and they focused on the other object at the moment of change."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Relevancy of emphasized text directs attention and influences test performance — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it

• Clear Structure Improves Learning — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it

• Change in the most-focused central object was detected at a low rate (41.66%) unless it was signalled and cued — related
• The change on the object being verbally described was the most detected change, seen by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%) — related
• In a multimedia animation, participants focused more on signalled objects and detected fewer changes in other screen areas — a broader claim this one bears on
• Changes were detected more easily on screens presenting fewer objects (66.66%) — related
• Signaling Improves Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
• Eye-tracking results confirm that just before students articulate a new manipulation strategy, their visual attention shifts from figural screen elements to a newly invented attentional-anchor location — related
• Producers signal their own argumentative position with arrows pointing toward their own arguments and more boxes around own arguments — related