Claims

The trial did not replicate Schellenberg's (2004) finding that music tuition increases attainment over other creative pursuits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? This much larger trial was unable to replicate the earlier finding that music tuition increased attainment over and above other creative pursuits. → Sarah Haywood 2015

Evidence

Sarah Haywood 2015

Sarah Haywood, Julia Griggs, Cheryl Lloyd, Stephen Morris, Zsolt Kiss, Amy Skipp. (2015). Creative Futures: Act, Sing, Play Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581247

q4 · i? · causal · r3

The report explicitly frames the trial as a larger-sample replication of Schellenberg's (2004) design comparing music tuition against drama, and states it "was unable to replicate this result" on maths and literacy attainment.

"This design was chosen for several reasons, including the fact that a previous study (Schellenberg, 2004) had found that music tuition increased attainment over and above other creative pursuits. This present study, which involved a much larger sample than Schellenberg, was unable to replicate this result."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.