Claims

Music workshops showed no greater impact on literacy attainment than drama workshops in the same trial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i0 Music workshops did not outperform the drama control on post-test standardised literacy PIPS scores; the printed effect size was 0.03. → Sarah Haywood 2015

Evidence

Sarah Haywood 2015

Sarah Haywood, Julia Griggs, Cheryl Lloyd, Stephen Morris, Zsolt Kiss, Amy Skipp. (2015). Creative Futures: Act, Sing, Play Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581247

q4 · i0 · causal · r3

The same three-arm pupil-level RCT's results table prints a literacy effect size of "0.03 (-0.07 to 0.13)", equivalent to 0 months progress, for music workshops compared to drama workshops on standardised PIPS literacy scores.

"Literacy* MUSIC workshops compared to drama workshops 0.03 (-0.07 to 0.13) 0 months"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.