Within-person reciprocal effects from fairness back to trust are weaker than trust-to-fairness effects, indicating an asymmetric rather than strictly unidirectional pattern¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? None of the nine within-person reciprocal paths from fairness to trust reached conventional significance (β = 0.03–0.07, all p > 0.10). → Fu L 2026
q3 i? Model comparison showed constraining trust-to-fairness paths worsened fit significantly while constraining reciprocal paths did not. → Fu L 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Fu L 2026¶
Fu L, Ouyang Z and Wu Q (2026). How trust prospectively predicts perceived fairness and learning motivation toward AI teaching assistants: a three-wave within-person longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 17:1900061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1900061
q3 · i? · associational · r2
RI-CLPM reciprocal cross-lagged estimates (N = 450); all nine fairness-to-trust paths also remained non-significant under BH-FDR correction.
"None of the nine within-person reciprocal paths reached conventional significance after random-intercept partitioning (β = 0.03–0.07, all p > 0.10), with Procedural Justice T1 → Integrity Trust T2 the closest to the threshold ( β = 0.07, p = 0.089)."
Fu L 2026 (2)¶
Fu L, Ouyang Z and Wu Q (2026). How trust prospectively predicts perceived fairness and learning motivation toward AI teaching assistants: a three-wave within-person longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 17:1900061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1900061
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Chi-square difference tests comparing the focal RI-CLPM against constrained models, supporting the asymmetry: trust changes precede fairness changes more reliably than the reverse at the intra-individual level.
"constraining the within-person trust→fairness paths to zero produced a significant decrement in fit, Δχ2(9) = 24.61, p = 0.003, whereas constraining the within-person reciprocal paths to zero did not significantly worsen fit, Δχ2(9) = 8.92, p = 0.445"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Within-person increases in student trust in AI teaching assistants predict subsequent within-person increases in perceived fairness, with ability trust the strongest antecedent — related
- Within-person change in perceived fairness mediates the longitudinal association between trust and learning motivation — related
- Procedural justice shows a within-person association with subsequent intrinsic motivation that is numerically larger than its association with extrinsic motivation, though the coefficient difference is not statistically significant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
asymmetric-reciprocal-fairness-trust-aita |
title |
Within-person reciprocal effects from fairness back to trust are weaker than trust-to-fairness effects, indicating an asymmetric rather than strictly unidirectional pattern |
description |
Within-person reciprocal effects from fairness back to trust are weaker than trust-to-fairness effects, indicating an asymmetric rather than strictly unidirectional pattern |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — fu-l-2026, fu-l-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.