Procedural justice shows a within-person association with subsequent intrinsic motivation that is numerically larger than its association with extrinsic motivation, though the coefficient difference is not statistically significant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i1 Procedural justice at Time 2 significantly predicted intrinsic motivation at Time 3 (β = 0.16) but not extrinsic motivation (β = 0.04, p = 0.310). → Fu L 2026 q3 i? The direct test of the difference between the two coefficients did not reach conventional significance (z = 1.87, p = 0.061). → Fu L 2026 (2)

Evidence¶

Fu L 2026¶

Fu L, Ouyang Z and Wu Q (2026). How trust prospectively predicts perceived fairness and learning motivation toward AI teaching assistants: a three-wave within-person longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 17:1900061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1900061

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

RI-CLPM within-person cross-lagged analysis (N = 450). The PJ→IM path survived BH-FDR correction (q = 0.012) while "the procedural justice → extrinsic motivation path (p = 0.310, q = 0.354)" remained non-significant under FDR control.

"Procedural Justice T2 showed a significant within-person effect on Intrinsic Motivation T3 (β = 0.16, p < 0.001) alongside a non-significant coefficient for Extrinsic Motivation T3 ( β = 0.04, p = 0.310)."

Fu L 2026 (2)¶

Fu L, Ouyang Z and Wu Q (2026). How trust prospectively predicts perceived fairness and learning motivation toward AI teaching assistants: a three-wave within-person longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 17:1900061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1900061

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Direct coefficient-difference test within the same RI-CLPM; the article states the difference "is directionally consistent with a stronger pathway to intrinsic motivation but does not itself reach conventional significance" and its confidence interval is wide relative to the point estimate.

"β(PJ → IM) − β(PJ → EM) = 0.12, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.25], z = 1.87, p = 0.061"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Motivation — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• GenAI shows positive effects on both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, with no reliable difference between the two (H-1c not supported) — related
• Trust and intrinsic motivation means rose across the semester while extrinsic motivation stayed relatively stable, and longitudinal measurement invariance held across waves — related
• Within-person change in perceived fairness mediates the longitudinal association between trust and learning motivation — related
• Within-person reciprocal effects from fairness back to trust are weaker than trust-to-fairness effects, indicating an asymmetric rather than strictly unidirectional pattern — related