At-risk students reported general satisfaction with the relational feedback intervention, and most respondents preferred it more frequently than twice per semester¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Survey responses from 9.27% of at-risk students indicated general satisfaction with the feedback intervention, and 60% of respondents preferred receiving it more frequently than the twice-per-semester schedule implemented. → Wei Dai 2025
Evidence¶
Wei Dai 2025¶
Wei Dai, Jionghao Lin, Flora Ji-Yoon Jin, Yi-Shan Tsai, Namrata Srivastava, Pierre Le Bodic, Dragan Gašević, and Guanliang Chen. (2025). Learning Analytics for Early Identification of At-Risk Students and Feedback Intervention. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(3), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8735
q2 · i? · design · r2
Email survey of all at-risk students identified in week 5 or week 8, with six background questions, ten five-point Likert perception items, and one multiple-choice frequency-preference item; descriptive statistics only. "survey responses from 9.27% of at-risk students indicated general satisfaction"; no effect size is printed.
"survey responses from 9.27% of at-risk students indicated general satisfaction with the provided feedback intervention, and 60% of the respondents expressed a preference for receiving the intervention more frequently than the twice-per-semester frequency implemented in the present study"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students report significantly higher accountability, preference for TBL, satisfaction, and total scores than neutral after the TBL module — related
- More than 30% of identified at-risk students visited previously unengaged learning activities within two weeks of the relational feedback email — related
- In a pilot study, the TigerGPT survey chatbot achieved a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score, with 50% of participants preferring it over traditional surveys — related
- The proportion of participating students classified as high-risk fell from 59% in week 4 to 39% by week 6 of the semester — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
at-risk-students-satisfied-prefer-frequent-feedback |
title |
At-risk students reported general satisfaction with the relational feedback intervention, and most respondents preferred it more frequently than twice per semester |
description |
At-risk students reported general satisfaction with the relational feedback intervention, and most respondents preferred it more frequently than twice per semester |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wei-dai-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.