In a pilot study, the TigerGPT survey chatbot achieved a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score, with 50% of participants preferring it over traditional surveys¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? TigerGPT achieved a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score in a pilot study, and 50% of participants preferred it over traditional surveys. → Jinwen Tang 2026
Evidence¶
Jinwen Tang 2026¶
Jinwen Tang. (2026). NEW AI-DRIVEN TOOLS FOR ENHANCING CAMPUS WELL-BEING: A PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION APPROACH. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10804 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10804
q2 · i? · design · r2
Pilot study evaluation of the TigerGPT conversational survey chatbot reported in the dissertation abstract and Chapter 1. The pilot reported "a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score" and 50% preference over traditional surveys; no effect size or sample size is printed.
"In a pilot study, TigerGPT demonstrated significant improvements over conventional methods, achieving a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score, with 50% of participants preferring it over traditional surveys."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- At-risk students reported general satisfaction with the relational feedback intervention, and most respondents preferred it more frequently than twice per semester — related
- 71% of surveyed Miami-Dade coaches reported the program improved their job satisfaction, up from a pre-program baseline where none reported being completely satisfied — related
- Usability testing with educators and developers identified chatbot strengths for independent challenge-solving but limited feedback for low-participation learners — related
- Users rate chatbots easy to use with clear, relevant, largely accurate responses, but the intrusive pop-up design is the largest annoyance — related
- The FACTRIA-aware chatbot received good usability ratings (SUS 70.84) and high usefulness ratings from most of the 11 stakeholders — related
- In a 16-rater usability survey after a session, CoLearn scores an overall mean of 4.0/5 with no dimension below ≈3.7, and 75% (12/16) would reuse it; Responsiveness is the lowest dimension — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tigergpt-pilot-usability-satisfaction |
title |
In a pilot study, the TigerGPT survey chatbot achieved a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score, with 50% of participants preferring it over traditional surveys |
description |
In a pilot study, the TigerGPT survey chatbot achieved a 75% usability rating and an 81% satisfaction score, with 50% of participants preferring it over traditional surveys |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jinwen-tang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.