Austin CMO-affiliated charters outperformed independent Austin charters in both subjects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i0 Austin CMO charters outgrew the state average (reading 0.1 SD/60 days; math 0.11 SD/65 days, both p<0.01) while independent charters fell below it (reading -0.06; math -0.10), and CMOs outperformed independents by 0.16 SD (96 days) in reading and 0.21 SD (124 days) in math. → CREDO 2022
Evidence¶
CREDO 2022¶
CREDO. (2022). City Study 2022: Austin. https://credo.stanford.edu
q2 · i0 · associational · r?
Charter subsector analysis for SY 2018-19. The printed row "A u s t i n C M O s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.1** 60** 0.11** 65**" shows CMOs significantly above the state average by 0.1 SD (60 days) in reading and 0.11 SD (65 days) in math; companion rows show independents below state (non-significant) and the CMO-versus-independent contrast at 0.16 SD (96 days) reading and 0.21 SD (124 days) math, both significant.
"A u s t i n C M O s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.1** 60** 0.11** 65**"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Austin charter students in poverty outperformed Austin district students in poverty in reading, with a non-significant math advantage — related
- Fort Worth CMO-affiliated charter schools significantly outperformed independent charter schools in reading growth, while independent charters lagged the state — related
- Newark CMO-affiliated charters outgrew the state average in both subjects, while independent charters did so only in math — related
- Houston CMO-affiliated charter students outgrew the state average in both subjects while independent charter students did not differ significantly — related
- Austin charter Hispanic students outperformed Austin district Hispanic students in reading growth — related
- Austin charter ELL students outperformed Austin district ELL students in reading growth — related
- Austin students' one-year growth in 2018-19 exceeded the state average in both reading and math — related
- CMO-affiliated charter schools outpace traditional public schools in reading and math while stand-alone charters gain in reading only — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
austin-cmo-vs-independent-charter-growth |
title |
Austin CMO-affiliated charters outperformed independent Austin charters in both subjects |
description |
Austin CMO-affiliated charters outperformed independent Austin charters in both subjects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — credo-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.