Houston CMO-affiliated charter students outgrew the state average in both subjects while independent charter students did not differ significantly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Houston CMOs exceeded the state average by 0.08 SD (46 days) in reading and 0.16 SD (92 days) in math, both significant, while Houston independent charters showed non-significant differences of 0.02 (14 days) in reading and -0.02 (-10 days) in math. → CREDO 2022
Evidence¶
CREDO 2022¶
CREDO. (2022). City Study 2022: Houston. https://credo.stanford.edu
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Charter subsector analysis table, 2018-19. CMOs vs. state average is significant in both subjects; independent charters vs. state average carries no significance asterisks in either subject.
"H o u s t o n C M O s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.08** 46** 0.16** 92** H o u s t o n I n d e p e n d e n t C h a r t e r s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.02 14 -0.02 -10"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Austin CMO-affiliated charters outperformed independent Austin charters in both subjects — related
- CMO-affiliated charter schools outpace traditional public schools in reading and math while stand-alone charters gain in reading only — related
- Fort Worth CMO-affiliated charter schools significantly outperformed independent charter schools in reading growth, while independent charters lagged the state — related
- Newark CMO-affiliated charters outgrew the state average in both subjects, while independent charters did so only in math — related
- Houston students made significantly greater math growth than the state average in 2018-19, but reading growth was not significantly different — related
- Students in poverty in Houston charter schools outperformed district-school students in poverty in both subjects — related
- Houston charter school students outperformed Houston other district school students in both reading and math in 2018-19 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
houston-cmo-charters-outgrow-state-independents-null |
title |
Houston CMO-affiliated charter students outgrew the state average in both subjects while independent charter students did not differ significantly |
description |
Houston CMO-affiliated charter students outgrew the state average in both subjects while independent charter students did not differ significantly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — credo-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.