Replacing the simulated worst-case profile with pupils' own SNS profiles added no measurable benefit¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? There was no difference in impact on awareness, attitudes, or behavior between the simulated-profile and own-profile conditions. → Vanderhoven 2015

Evidence¶

Vanderhoven 2015¶

Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., & Valcke, M. (2015). Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: A design-based research approach. Ghent University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9415-4

q3 · i? · design · r3

ANCOVA analysis of 80 pupils (average age 15.64) comparing the revised intervention using pupils' own profiles against the previous simulated-profile intervention; all comparisons non-significant (p > .02).

"the quantitative results of the study showed that there was no difference in impact on the awareness, attitudes and behavior of the pupils between the two conditions and therefore that there was no added value of making the context more authentic by using their own profiles"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Domain Context — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• The initially developed SNS safety course increased awareness of contact risks but did not change attitudes or behavior — related
• Adding individual reflection to the SNS safety course produced changes in attitudes and behavior that the collaborative version did not — related
• Active parental involvement via a joint homework task improved boys' safe behavior on SNSs, with a gender interaction — related
• School attention to SNS safety positively influences privacy care, which in turn relates to safer pupil behavior — related