The initially developed SNS safety course increased awareness of contact risks but did not change attitudes or behavior¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr3·q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the first intervention study, awareness of contact risks increased in the experimental condition compared to control, but attitudes and behavior did not differ significantly. → Vanderhoven 2015
q2 i? Significantly more pupils in the experimental condition reported changing something on their profile (17% vs. 7%), mostly privacy settings. → Vanderhoven 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Vanderhoven 2015¶
Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., & Valcke, M. (2015). Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: A design-based research approach. Ghent University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9415-4
q3 · i? · design · r3
Pretest-posttest mixed-method survey intervention study with 1035 pupils (average age 15.14), control vs. experimental condition, multilevel analysis. The course raised awareness but, per Table 4, attitude and behavior differences were not significant (p > .02).
"Quantitative results showed that the awareness of contact risks on SNSs increased when the pupils were involved in the course, compared with those of the control group"
Vanderhoven 2015 (2)¶
Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., & Valcke, M. (2015). Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: A design-based research approach. Ghent University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9415-4
q2 · i? · design · r3
Open-question data from the same first intervention study: 17% vs. 7% reported profile changes, yet "83% of the teenagers reported not having changed anything".
"in the experimental condition significantly more pupils reported having changed something on their profile (17% vs. 7% in the control condition), mostly their privacy settings (75%) and personal information (14%; including contact information)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Active parental involvement via a joint homework task improved boys' safe behavior on SNSs, with a gender interaction — related
- Replacing the simulated worst-case profile with pupils' own SNS profiles added no measurable benefit — related
- Adding individual reflection to the SNS safety course produced changes in attitudes and behavior that the collaborative version did not — related
- A parents' information evening improved parents' skills and prompted information-sharing, but reached only a minority of parents — related
- School attention to SNS safety positively influences privacy care, which in turn relates to safer pupil behavior — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
initial-sns-course-awareness-only |
title |
The initially developed SNS safety course increased awareness of contact risks but did not change attitudes or behavior |
description |
The initially developed SNS safety course increased awareness of contact risks but did not change attitudes or behavior |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — vanderhoven-2015, vanderhoven-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.