Claims

Cognitive benefits of balance training do not differ by age in adults aged 19–65

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Age did not correlate with pre-to-post change in any physical or cognitive variable (all r < 0.12, p > 0.250). → Rogge 2017

Evidence

Rogge 2017

Rogge, A.-K., Röder, B., Zech, A., Nagel, V., Hollander, K., Braumann, K.-M. & Hötting, K. (2017). Balance training improves memory and spatial cognition in healthy adults. Scientific Reports 7:5661. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06071-9

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pearson correlations between age and change scores across physical and cognitive variables were non-significant; the authors call for larger samples to test age-group differences with higher power.

"Age did not correlate with changes from pre- to posttest in any of the physical and cognitive variables (all r < 0.12, p > 0.250), indicating that younger and older participants did not differ in their benefits after training."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id balance-training-benefits-age-invariant
title Cognitive benefits of balance training do not differ by age in adults aged 19–65
description Cognitive benefits of balance training do not differ by age in adults aged 19–65
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rogge-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.