The basic science process skills test used showed a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.876 across 10 items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The 10-item essay basic science process skills test met reliability criteria with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.876 and had previously demonstrated construct and content validity. → Setiyo Prajoko 2017
Evidence¶
Setiyo Prajoko 2017¶
Setiyo Prajoko, Mohamad Amin, Fatchur Rohman, Muhana Gipayana. (2017). The Usage of Recycle Materials for Science Practicum: Is There Any Effect on Science Process Skills? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.6, No.1. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Instrument development reported in the Method section: a 10-item essay basic science process skills test, previously developed with construct and content validity per Prajoko et al. (2016). The article prints "Cronbach 's Alpha score of the test is 0. 876" across 10 items.
"Based on Table 1, it can be seen that the Cronbach ’s Alpha score of the test is 0. 876. It means that this test meets the criteria of reliability"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A high Cronbach's alpha across items measuring distinct knowledge aspects indicates the test is not working as intended — related
- Using recycle materials for science practicum has a statistically significant effect on Open University students' basic science process skills — related
- A low alpha does not necessarily indicate high content validity, because reliability and validity can both be high — a broader claim this one bears on
- The AEEGS software demonstrated internal consistency of Cronbach alpha 0.86 in trial testing and was validated for face and content validity by three software experts — related
- The post-interaction reflection instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .863) — related
- CTAT shows robust psychometric properties for higher education CS/AI students, with reliable internal consistency and adequate IRT item parameters — related
- TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
- Expert panels and 31 experienced physics teachers rated the software favourably, with reliability of Cronbach's alpha .843 across 24 items — related
- The post-study survey instrument showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90) — related
- Students responded positively to using recycle materials in science practicum (questionnaire mean 2.82 of 3) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.