Claims

The basic science process skills test used showed a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.876 across 10 items

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 10-item essay basic science process skills test met reliability criteria with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.876 and had previously demonstrated construct and content validity. → Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Evidence

Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Setiyo Prajoko, Mohamad Amin, Fatchur Rohman, Muhana Gipayana. (2017). The Usage of Recycle Materials for Science Practicum: Is There Any Effect on Science Process Skills? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.6, No.1. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Instrument development reported in the Method section: a 10-item essay basic science process skills test, previously developed with construct and content validity per Prajoko et al. (2016). The article prints "Cronbach 's Alpha score of the test is 0. 876" across 10 items.

"Based on Table 1, it can be seen that the Cronbach ’s Alpha score of the test is 0. 876. It means that this test meets the criteria of reliability"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.