Claims

The post-study survey instrument showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Cronbach's alpha across the Likert items was 0.90, indicating high internal consistency of the survey instrument. → Hornung 2026

Evidence

Hornung 2026

Hornung, I., Marasinghe Arachchige, D., Kumarage, T., Agrawal, G., Deng, Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Liu, H. (2026). CyberAGENTS: Structured Autonomy for Agentic Gamified Learning in Cybersecurity. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07965 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.07965

q2 · i? · design · r2

Reliability analysis of the post-study Likert survey administered to undergraduate participants after interacting with the full agent loop. The article reports "α= 0.90" as a descriptive reliability statistic; no effect size applies.

"Cronbach's alpha across the Likert items was α= 0.90, indicating high internal consistency of the survey instrument."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cyberagents-survey-alpha-090
title The post-study survey instrument showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90)
description The post-study survey instrument showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hornung-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.