Students responded positively to using recycle materials in science practicum (questionnaire mean 2.82 of 3)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students gave positive feedback on recycle-materials practicum, with a questionnaire average score of 2.82 out of a maximum of 3. → Setiyo Prajoko 2017
Evidence¶
Setiyo Prajoko 2017¶
Setiyo Prajoko, Mohamad Amin, Fatchur Rohman, Muhana Gipayana. (2017). The Usage of Recycle Materials for Science Practicum: Is There Any Effect on Science Process Skills? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.6, No.1. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive analysis of a 10-question student feedback questionnaire on recycle-materials-based practicum, stated to meet construct and content validity per Prajoko et al. (2016). The article reports "average score 2.82 out of a maximum score 3". Descriptive only; no inferential test or effect size.
"Based on the questionnaire that obtained average score 2.82 out of a maximum score 3. The results indicated that students positively respond use of recycle materials in the science practicum."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Using recycle materials for science practicum has a statistically significant effect on Open University students' basic science process skills — related
- The article attributes the recycle-materials advantage to problem-solving challenge, motivation, and creativity, and notes control-class students without worksheets scored lower — related
- Experimental-class students scored higher on average (78 vs 70) on the science process skills test — related
- Score distributions differed: the experimental class majority scored in the 80–90 range (49%) while the control class majority scored in the 70–80 range (64%) — related
- The basic science process skills test used showed a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.876 across 10 items — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.