Claims

Students' basic geometry skills on curved-solid objects improved after learning with the media

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the broad-scale before-after test, the mean basic geometry skills score rose from 4.48 before treatment to 6.66 after treatment, a difference the t-test found significant. → Nurwijayanti 2019

Evidence

Nurwijayanti 2019

Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2019). Combining Google SketchUp and Ispring Suite 8: A breakthrough to develop geometry learning media. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 103-116. https://jme.ejournal.uns.ac.id/index.php/jme

q2 · i? · design · r3

Broad-scale before-after test of basic geometry skills on curved-solid objects, with 85 students before and 82 after. After normality and homogeneity checks, the t-test rejected the null hypothesis, so "the after treatment was 6.66" was better than the before mean of 4.48.

"The average score from the group before treatment was 4.48 and t he after treatment was 6.66."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.