The Ispring Suite 8 geometry media with Google SketchUp 3D effects was judged valid by media and material experts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Media experts rated the media good in two validation rounds, with the second validation average score of 3.93. → Nurwijayanti 2019
q2 i? Material experts rated the media fair to good across three validators, reaching 3.80 in the second validation. → Nurwijayanti 2019 (2)
Evidence¶
Nurwijayanti 2019¶
Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2019). Combining Google SketchUp and Ispring Suite 8: A breakthrough to develop geometry learning media. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 103-116. https://jme.ejournal.uns.ac.id/index.php/jme
q2 · i? · design · r3
Expert judgement during the product development stage using a media experts' validation sheet. The first validation averaged 3.75, "which is in the good category"; after revisions the second validation scored 3.93, also good.
"The media first validation average score was 3.75 , which is in the good category. However, there were suggestions and feedbacks from the validators."
Nurwijayanti 2019 (2)¶
Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2019). Combining Google SketchUp and Ispring Suite 8: A breakthrough to develop geometry learning media. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 103-116. https://jme.ejournal.uns.ac.id/index.php/jme
q2 · i? · design · r2
Material experts' judgement with three validators. Scores of 3.16, 3.04 and 3.64 led to revisions; "According to the second validation, the score was 3.80 which is in a good category."
"The average score from the first validator was 3.16 and the second validator was 3.04 both were in fair category, and the third validator was 3.64 in a good category."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers and students judged the geometry media practical in individual and limited-scale trials — related
- In a static group comparison, classes taught with the media achieved higher geometry scores than control classes — related
- Students' basic geometry skills on curved-solid objects improved after learning with the media — related
- Preliminary study found textbook-only teaching and students whose geometry ability was limited to the visual skill — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.