Claims

Teachers receiving BEST in CLASS showed higher observed adherence and competence in delivering the intervention practices at posttest than comparison teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? BiCACS adherence at posttest averaged 4.53 (SD = 0.98) for BEST in CLASS teachers versus 2.43 (SD = 1.61) for BAU teachers, with competence 5.51 versus 4.30. → Maureen A. Conroy 2019

Evidence

Maureen A. Conroy 2019

Maureen A. Conroy, Kevin S. Sutherland, James Algina, Crystal Ladwig, Brittany Werch, Jose Martinez, Gabriel Jessee, Maria Gyure. (2019). Outcomes of the BEST in CLASS Intervention on Teachers' Use of Effective Practices, Self-Efficacy, and Classroom Quality. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0003.V48-1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive fidelity results from 756 BiCACS observations across both conditions (BEST in CLASS n = 389; BAU n = 367) at pre- and posttest. BAU posttest adherence was 2.43 (SD = 1.61) and BEST in CLASS competence was 5.51 (SD = 0.33) versus 4.30 (SD = 0.42) in BAU; no inferential test is printed for these contrasts.

"For teachers in the BEST in CLASS condition, mean adherence was 4.53 (SD = 0.98, range = 3.72–5.99) at posttest."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.