Implementation fidelity and global instructional quality were high across the intervention's instructional components¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Fourteen fidelity observations across both tutors yielded a mean implementation score of 3.81 (SD = 0.64) on a 4-point scale. → Solís 2017
Evidence¶
Solís 2017¶
Solís, M., Scammacca, N., Barth, A. E., & Roberts, G. J. (2017). Text-based Vocabulary Intervention Training Study: Supporting Fourth Graders with Low Reading Comprehension and Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 103-115. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141988
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Fidelity observation analysis: fourteen observations across both tutors rated each component on a 4-point Likert scale; the mean implementation score was 3.81 (SD = 0.64) and global quality was 3.85 (SD = 0.40).
"The mean implementation score across instructional components and across tutors was 3.81 (SD = 0.64, range 0.00 to 4.00). The mean implementation score for global observations of quality was 3.85 (SD = 0.40, range 2.00 to 4.00)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fidelity of implementation of early language curricula varies widely across teachers and studies — a broader claim this one bears on
- FSN coaches and teachers implemented core program components with excellent adherence, with implementation quality lower during the teacher phase than the coach phase — related
- Teachers receiving BEST in CLASS showed higher observed adherence and competence in delivering the intervention practices at posttest than comparison teachers — related
- Teachers allocated on average five percent of intervention sessions to predicting and purpose setting, with fidelity of implementation averaging 45.4% — reports the opposite
- Tutoring sessions were implemented with high procedural fidelity (mean 93.4%) — related
- CBC and behavioral plan implementation were delivered with high fidelity in the rural trial — related
- Minimally trained, non-education-major college tutors implemented the structured program with high fidelity (average 96.3%) — related
- Treatment teachers showed relatively high fidelity to the ECHOS model, with adherence and quality scores increasing slightly from mid-year to year end — related
- Basic and Plus teachers showed fairly high and statistically similar adherence to the MTP-M/S curricula — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.