Claims

Implementation fidelity and global instructional quality were high across the intervention's instructional components

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Fourteen fidelity observations across both tutors yielded a mean implementation score of 3.81 (SD = 0.64) on a 4-point scale. → Solís 2017

Evidence

Solís 2017

Solís, M., Scammacca, N., Barth, A. E., & Roberts, G. J. (2017). Text-based Vocabulary Intervention Training Study: Supporting Fourth Graders with Low Reading Comprehension and Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 103-115. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141988

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Fidelity observation analysis: fourteen observations across both tutors rated each component on a 4-point Likert scale; the mean implementation score was 3.81 (SD = 0.64) and global quality was 3.85 (SD = 0.40).

"The mean implementation score across instructional components and across tutors was 3.81 (SD = 0.64, range 0.00 to 4.00). The mean implementation score for global observations of quality was 3.85 (SD = 0.40, range 2.00 to 4.00)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.